Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Ethical Standards for Human Service Professionals
All professionals in the human services field must exercise sound judgment and behaviour when working with clients, which requires knowledge of important responsibilities and duties. In this discussion, you will reflect upon various professional and ethical behaviours as they relate to case management.
Prior to completing this discussion, read Chapter 2, as well as the Ethical Standards for Human Service Professionals (Links to an external site.), this weeks Instructor Guidance, and complete the Ethical and Professional Behaviours (Links to an external site.) drag and drop activity. The Jansson (2016) article from this weeks Recommended Resources addresses conflicts between ethics and agency demands, and it may be helpful to read. Prepare an initial post, in which you
Assess the overall significance of specific ethical and professional behaviours in the case management process.
Determine the knowledge and/or skills that should be demonstrated by professionals.
Support your post by providing examples of applicable ethical standards, as well as examples of professional responsibilities from the text and drag and drop activity.
Provide a response of at least 300 words that sufficiently addresses all aspects of the prompt, making sure to properly cite and reference the text in addition to any additional outside sources used. Refer to the In-Text Citation Guide (Links to an external site.) and the Common APA Reference list Models (Links to an external site.) for further assistance.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Ethical Standards for Human Service Professionals