- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@collegepaper.us
Ethical SWOT Analysis Research Case Study
Ethical SWOT Analysis Research Case Study
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Ethical SWOT Analysis Research Case Study
Week 1: Understanding Ethics
Week 2: Ethical SWOT Analysis
Week 3: Historical Context and Ethical Questions
Week 4: Literature Review
Week 5: Equity Impact Assessment
Week 6: Code of Ethics
Week 7: Recommendations
The structure of your presentation will follow the chronological order of the assignments. Here is a suggested organization.
Title slide, including the presentation title, your name, name of the course, and the date
A discussion of your strongest ethical values
Explain which philosophies and philosophers are your greatest influences.
A high-level overview of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of your chosen technology based on your ethical values
A brief history and context of your chosen technology
A reflection of what you learned from your research
An abridged assessment of the equity impact of your technology
Key points in your code of ethics
A summary of your key recommendations
A conclusion with final thoughts
References in APA style
For this presentation, you will provide an audio narration of approximately 8–10 minutes. There are a variety of ways to add audio narration, but using the Record Audio feature in PowerPoint is highly recommended for its simplicity and ease of use. If you wish to use something else, please check with your instructor first.
Effective presentations will include the following elements.
Well-designed, well-balanced slides that incorporate visual aids and text harmoniously
In-slide references to sources
Clear, confident audio narration
Correct use of grammar, spelling, and punctuation
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results
