Ethical Theories essay 1

Ethical Theories essay

Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839

Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages: 5-10

Instructions:

Ethical Theories essay

Module 2: Discussion – Ethical Theories – Discussion Group 3?

In order to facilitate a deeper understanding of the ethical theories, please do the ?following:?

First, choose one of the below theories. I suggest choosing the theory that you find the ?most plausible based on the criteria Vaughan discusses on pages 47- 49:?

• Natural Law Theory?

• Kantian Ethics?

• Act Utilitarianism?

• Rule Utilitarianism?

• Virtue Ethics?

• Feminist Ethics/Ethics of Care?

Then, answer the following questions regarding your chosen ethical theory, and number ?your responses accordingly.?

1. Drawing from both the book and the accompanying lectures, describe how to use ?this theory to determine whether an action is right or wrong, including any ?fundamental concepts and the type of information needed by such a theorist to ?accurately make such a judgment. Please take the time to fully develop your ?response.?

2. Why did you choose this theory? That is, why do you think your chosen theory is ?superior to the competing theories? Give two specific strengths of your theory that ?address weaknesses inherent in two different competing ethical theories.?

3. Drawing from the lectures, explain one common weakness of your chosen theory. ?Then, acting as if you were defending this theory from a critic, how would you ?respond in an attempt to counter this weakness??

4. In at least one paragraph and incorporating some outside research, explain how to ?use this theory to decide what to do in the following scenario:?

Mr. A needed a kidney transplant. Rather than waiting for a deceased donor ?kidney match to become available, his wife and two children agreed to be ?prospective donors, and underwent the appropriate evaluations including ?genetic testing. After the evaluations were completed, it was determined that ?the eldest son was the most compatible

and thereby best suited to be the ?donor. The evaluation process, however, also revealed additional information. It ?revealed that the eldest son was not biologically related to

Mr. A although ?through multiple interactions with Mr. A and his son, the doctor knew that they ?thought they were biologically related. What, if anything, should the doctor do ?

before allowing the kidney transplant to proceed? ?

 

Please review the Discussion Grading Rubric for the grading criteria, and follow the ?Course Calendar for the relevant due dates.

 

Discussion Board Grading Rubric?

 

For each graded forum, a student may earn up to 20 points, based on the following criteria, for her/his discussion? contributions. At minimum, students are required to

respond to the initial discussion prompt and to reply to two? other students’ posts. Please keep in mind that posting more than 3 times may be an effective strategy to boost?

 

one’s score since an extra substantive post or two may help to offset any minor deficiencies.?\

Ethical Theories essay

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Ethical Theories essay

Ethical Theories essay

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!