Ethics Assignment for Project Managers

July 22, 2021

Ethics Assignment for Project Managers

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Ethics Assignment for Project Managers

Use MS Word to create a one-page paper that answers each of the following points:

Your examination of the many definitions of ethics and the significance of a project manager adhering to a “code of ethics” (i.e., what impact will the code have on human behavior?).

Identify what you believe are the top three behaviors in what you would call “your” project management code of ethics.

What constitutes “ethical” business practices differs from country to country around the globe. For example, in some European nations, buying a limited-supply commodity with the sole goal of reselling it for a higher price is considered a smart business technique, yet in the United States, this might be considered unlawful “scalping.” How would you respond as a project manager if you were working on an international project that required you to do something that was considered

“ethical” in another country but “not ethical” in the US?
For this section of the assignment, use the following sub-titles:

Ethics is defined as:

The significance of project managers following a “code of ethics”
Your personal code of ethics’ top three behaviors (be sure to link these behaviors to project management)
How should a project manager respond to various situational ethical standards as they emerge from country to country?

Ethics Assignment for Project Managers

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met