Evaluating Technology in Early Childhood Settings Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Evaluating Technology in Early Childhood Settings Assignment
8082 Module 4 Discussion 2:
Evaluating Technology in Early Childhood Settings
Professionals in many fields are required to incorporate the use of technology on a regular basis. In some learning environments, early childhood professionals are required to incorporate technology as part of children’s learning experience. Technology can be used to engage children or spark their interest. Technology can also help prepare children for the future. With that being said, not all technology provides equitable benefits for children.
For this Discussion, you will explore a variety of technological tools to determine which are appropriate and enhance development and learning.
Assignment Task Part 1
To Prepare-
Consider the ways technology is infused into every aspect of daily life. Think about your experience and perspective regarding the following statement:
It is no longer a question of whether or not technology should be a part of early childhood settings but instead, which technology tools are appropriate and truly enhance development and learning.
To Do:
Write a 1 ½ page explanation based on scholarly resources from the last 5 years, share examples of at least two technology tools and how they could be incorporated into early childhood settings in ways that enhance children’s development and learning. Provide rationales for why you selected these tools, the ages for which they are appropriate, and how they may enhance children’s development and learning experiences.
Assignment Task Part 2
Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.
Respond to two of your colleagues’ postings of 125 words each in one or more of the following prompts:
Read through the posts on the Discussion forum. Explain how the technology suggested by your peers might be differentiated to build on the strengths and meet the needs of children’s varying ages and abilities.
As you envision the setting and examples your colleagues describe, offer several suggestions to ensure equitable access for all children in this early childhood setting.
Using one of the technological tools suggested by your peers, explain how this tool might be used incorrectly or ineffectively. Provide a suggestion for overcoming this challenge and assist them in avoiding the misuse of this technology.
Cite appropriate references in APA format to substantiate your thinking.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow