Evaluating the importance of comparative advantage
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Evaluating the importance of comparative advantage
Please show these topics on your assignment and then provide your explanations.
Article Assignment
In Chapter One of your text, there is a section with the caption of Ethics Capsule 1. What Ethic Variables Are Most Important Doing Business Read this ethical article and then summarize the article using the required template. Please use at least two outside sources when validating your statements. Being it is a short article, it is imperative to supplement the information with outside research.
Please show the subtopics as shown in the template. The student will also use two additional (outside) sources in addition to the text in validating their discussion. Any source retrieved from the AU online library is a reliable source. The paper will include a cover page, reference page, and the information from the Ethic Capsule 1. Please do not use direct quotes, or word-for-word from the text, from articles, or any other source. This must be in APA format.
Please submit the article on or before the stated due date.
Article Template
Framework
Provide a general overview or background for the article.
Explanation of the Issues
Explain the major issues of the article
Evidence
Identify pertinent information in investigating a point of view or conclusion
Influence of Context and Assumptions
What are the assumptions being made?
Student’s Position
What is your hypothesis or thesis of the article?
Conclusions and Related Outcomes
Based on the above criteria, what is your conclusion (implications and consequences?)
Reference
In accordance with APA
Example
Doe, John (2010), Evaluating the importance of comparative advantage. Wall Street
Journal, 22, 2010….etc.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow