Evaluating the Risks Research Assignment

Evaluating the Risks Research Assignment

Instructions:

Evaluating the Risks Research Assignment

Homework Assignment

Address the following questions:

1. What were the primary risk sources that emerged repeatedly in evaluating the risks?
2. What other secondary risk sources were identified?
3. How were these emerging risk sources helpful?
4. How would this risk assessment aid in the decision on whether or not to proceed with the new HR strategy
5. How would risk assessment impact the organization’s proposed human resource strategy?

Requirements:

The homework assignments are not opinion compositions, or a book, chapter, or article review. These assignments are positional arguments that are entirely supported by empirical evidence and well-known industry facts. You can include your personal experiences and ideas if it directly relates to the topic, or reinforces your position. However, you must support all statements with evidence. All submissions must adhere to APA guidelines. APA writing is an academic standard; therefore, it is not optional; it is mandatory.

Be a scholarly submission

Include a title page

Times New Roman font, 1-inch margin, and double-spaced

Be at least two pages in length

Should not consist of any bullet-points

Have a reference page with at least four academic references Be written in a clear and concise manner

You CANNOT use Wikipedia, LinkedIn articles, blogs, paid vendors, certification websites, or similar sources in academic writing. You CAN use reputable industry articles from publications similar to ComputerWeekly, PCMag, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, or similar sources. Academic journals and popular industry articles are accessible in the university’s library databases and Google Scholar. All references should not have a publication date older than 2005.

Points deducted if your submission:

Does not use the required textbook and at least four additional reference sources

You CANNOT use Wikipedia, LinkedIn articles, blogs, paid vendors, certification websites, or similar sources in academic writing. You CAN use reputable industry articles from publications similar to Compute rWeekly, PCMag, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, or similar sources. Academic journals and popular industry articles are accessible in the university’s library databases and Google Scholar. All references should not have a publication date older than 2005.

Does not answer the question(s) thoroughly meaning at least 2 pages paragraphs

Primarily consists of bullet points

Uses statements such as “based on my knowledge,” “according to me,” “as per my knowledge,” or similar

Contains contractual phrases, as an example “shouldn’t” “couldn’t” or “didn’t,” or similar

Uses vague words or phrases such as “proper,” “appropriate,” “adequate,” “it is obvious,” “it is clear,” “in fact,” or similar to describe a process, function, or procedure

As an example, “proper incident response plan,” “appropriate IT professional,” “adequate security,” or similar. These words are subjective because they have different meanings to different individuals.

Evaluating the Risks Research Assignment

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Evaluating the Risks Research Assignment

Evaluating the Risks Research Assignment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!