Evaluation of Sexism in Men and Women Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Evaluation of Sexism in Men and Women Essay
Read the article, “When Men Experience Sexism.”
“Women have been fighting against sexism for a long time. If men can learn from them, it will be to everyone’s benefit.”
- What is meant by this statement?
- Cite specific examples from the article to support your conclusions.
See rubric for specific grading criteria.
Name: Reflection Essay Grading Rubric
Meets Expectations Approaches Expectations Does Not Meet Expectations Depth of Reflection Points Range:20.8 (32.00%) – 26 (40.00%) Essay demonstrates an in-depth reflection on and application of the concepts presented in the course materials. Examples are clear and detailed, and interpretations are insightful and well supported.
Points Range:15.6 (24.00%) – 20.54 (31.60%) Essay demonstrates a general reflection on and application of the concepts presented in the course materials. Appropriate examples may not be provided, and interpretations may not be supported.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 15.34 (23.60%) Essay lacks reflection on or application of the concepts presented in the course materials. Examples and interpretations are missing or unsupported.
Evidence and Practice Points Range:20.8 (32.00%) – 26 (40.00%) Essay shows strong evidence of the synthesis of the ideas presented and insights gained.
Points Range:15.6 (24.00%) – 20.54 (31.60%) Essay shows some evidence of the synthesis of the ideas presented and insights gained.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 15.34 (23.60%) Essay shows no evidence of the synthesis of the ideas presented or insights gained.
Structure Points Range:5.2 (8.00%) – 6.5 (10.00%) Essay is of appropriate length, and writing is clear, concise, and well organized with excellent sentence and paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner.
Points Range:3.9 (6.00%) – 5.135 (7.90%) Essay may not be of appropriate length, and writing may not be well organized with good sentence and paragraph construction.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3.835 (5.90%) Essay is not of appropriate length. Writing is unclear and disorganized. Thoughts ramble and make little sense.
Mechanics and APA Style Points Range:5.2 (8.00%) – 6.5 (10.00%) The assignment consistently follows current APA Style and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.
Points Range:3.9 (6.00%) – 5.135 (7.90%) The assignment consistently follows current APA Style with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.
Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3.835 (5.90%) No attempt to follow APA Style is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.
Evaluation of Sexism in Men and Women Essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow