Evolution of the Ebola Virus Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Evolution of the Ebola Virus Discussion
A bullet style outline using a standard hierarchical format and a working bibliography containing a minimum of seven references from peer reviewed journals and appropriate government websites.
An outline should have:
First order point indicated by Roman numeral. Second order points denoted by letters;
Arabic numerals used for tertiary points and so forth. In text citations are sequential in order of use and of superscript format. The working bibliography list must be written consistent with AMA style.
Once you have sufficiently researched your topic, develop the following points in an outline format:
Define the problem (nature, extent, significance, etc.).
Describe the agent.
- Describe the condition (briefly).
- Examine the above sources for data on morbidity and mortality in the selected health problem.
Summarize these data on the distribution of the selected health problem according to the following factors using tables, graphs, or other illustrations whenever possible:
Host characteristics
- Age
- Sex
- Nativity
- Marital status
- Ethnic group
Environmental attributes
- Geographic areas
Social and economic factors
- Income
- Housing
- Occupation
- Education
- Temporal variation
- Secular
Cyclic
- Seasonal
- Epidemic
Any additional characteristic that contributes to an epidemiologic description of the disease
- Summarize any current hypotheses that have been proposed to explain the observed distribution.
- List the principal gaps in knowledge about the distribution of the health problem.
- Suggest areas for further epidemiologic research.
- Critically appraise the data as a whole; consult primary sources and important original papers.
- Reference Page:
For this assignment, you are required to provide at least 8-10 referenced sources (for the final presentation, you are required to have between 10-15 refereced sources). Sources should be published within the past ten years. Sources should be from governmental, peer-reviewed literature, or non-governmental (NGO) publications intended for a professional audience. The sources should exclude newspapers, lay magazines, dictionaries, encyclopedias, Wikipedia, Web-M, or non-refereed Internet sources intended for the lay public. Sources of data that you should consider using in your exploration may include:
- morbidity and mortality reports (vital statistics): World Health Organization and international reports; U.S., federal, state, and local annual and periodic reports
- current literature on the selected health problem
- reports of special surveys
Evolution of the Ebola Virus Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow