Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Evolutionary Biology Creating a Phylogenetic Tree Paper
Human Microbiome Questions
Iniesta, A.A., Hillson, N.J., & Shapiro, L. (2010). Cell pole-specific activation of a critical bacterial cell cycle kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 107, 7012-7017.
Evolutionary Biology Creating a Phylogenetic Tree Paper
While moving samples from your lab’s DNA collections, one of your employees has lost the tag for a DNA sample. In order to identify the sample, you sequence DNA from the sample (called species “X”), and align it with sequences of the same gene from three other species. Both A and B are animals, while C is a plant . In the alignment below, a dot indicates that a species has the same base as the top (first) sequence. In other words, only the differences from the first sequence are shown.
(c) (Based on your results from this preliminary analysis, is species X most likely a plant or an animal?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Evolutionary Biology Creating a Phylogenetic Tree Paper |
Evolutionary Biology Creating a Phylogenetic Tree Paper