Examination of Corporate Governance and Strategic Management Issues
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Examination of Corporate Governance and Strategic Management Issues
Answering the following questions in detailed paragraph format. Please use your PowerPoint slides and other professional reading resources (internet research) to answer the following questions. Each response should be a minimum of 150 words. Support your responses using cited research in APA format.
Chapter 4
- Explain the evolution of corporate governance. What problems developed? What are the current trends?
- Explain how governance failures such as Enron and the global financial crisis could happen. How might they be avoided?
- Discuss the pros and cons of the shareholder-primacy and director-primacy models of corporate governance. Which do you prefer and why?
Chapter 5
- Identify the steps involved in the strategic management process.
- What is the difference between integrated reporting and a social performance report?
- What is social entrepreneurship and how is it related to the bottom of the pyramid (BOP)?
- What are the major ways in which public affairs might be incorporated into every managerial job? Rank them in terms of what you think their impact might be.
Chapter 6
- Following the approach indicated in Figure 6-1, identify a new issue category not listed in Figure 2. Identify several examples of crises that have occurred in recent years under each issue category.
- Identify a crisis that has occurred in your life or in the life of someone you know, and briefly explain it in terms of the four crisis stages: prodromal, acute, chronic, and resolution.
- Research the impacts on business organizations of the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and the scandals of the early to mid-2000s. What have been successful and unsuccessful examples of crisis management that have come out of this research? Is terrorism a likely crisis for which business may prepare? How does preparation for terrorism (which comes from without) compare with preparation for ethical scandals (which come from within)?
Rubric
Case Study (1)
Case Study (1) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcome. Understanding of Concepts and Terms Responses show the student’s understanding of concepts and terms
10 Pts Exemplary
Masterful demonstration of understanding of concepts and terms
8 Pts Accomplished
Skillful demonstration of understanding of concepts and terms
6 Pts Beginning
Minimal demonstration of understanding of concepts and terms
0 Pts Not Evident
No demonstration of understanding of concepts and terms
10 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcome. Utilizing Chapter Concepts & Readings to Analyze Case Presented accurate & relevant information, appeared knowledgeable about the case studies assigned and the topic discussed, offered strategies for dealing with the problems identified in the case studies
10 Pts Exemplary
Masterful application of chapter concepts and readings to analyze case
8 Pts Accomplished
Skillful application of chapter concepts and readings to analyze case
6 Pts Beginning
Minimal application of chapter concepts and readings to analyze case
0 Pts Not Evident
No application of chapter concepts to analyze case
10 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeRule Applicatin/Analysi s Analysis was provided for each question
10 Pts Exemplary
All questions are answered and provide a masterful demonstration of an understanding of issues related to organizational ethics course learning outcomes.
8 Pts Accomplished
All questions are answered and provide a skillful demonstration of an understanding of issues related to organizational ethics course learning outcomes.
6 Pts Beginning
Some questions are not answered. Those that are answered provide little demonstration of an understanding of issues related to organizational ethics course learning outcomes.
0 Pts Not Evident
No questions are answered. No demonstration of an understanding of issues related to organizational ethics course learning outcomes.
10 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcome. Writing All key facts are recorded and organized in a neat and orderly fashion â paragraph form with proper punctuation, document demonstrates excellent APA formatting skills
10 Pts Exemplary
Masterful attention to grammar, punctuation, and spelling. All sources are critically reviewed, documented and formatted following standard practices of the field (APA)
8 Pts Accomplished
Skillful attention to grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Most sources are critically reviewed and documented following standard practices of the field (APA)
6 Pts Beginning
Minimal attention to grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Sources meet the minimum requirements for being critically reviewed and documented following standard practices of the field (APA)
0 Pts Not Evident
No attention to grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Insufficient sources and/or insufficient quality, critical review and documentation. Standard practices of the field are not followed.
10 pts This criterion is linked to a learning outcome. Application of learned material Response shows the student’s capacity to apply learned material to new scenarios
10 Pts Exemplary
Masterful application of learned material to new scenarios
8 Pts Accomplished
Skillful application of learned material to new scenarios
6 Pts Beginning
Minimal application of learned material to new scenarios
0 Pts Not Evident
No application of learned material to new scenarios
Examination of Corporate Governance and Strategic Management Issues
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow