Family Dynamics and Social Support Networks
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Family Dynamics and Social Support Networks
Two things to think about here. How will our families continue to change and grow in the future? What effect will technology have on our family structure?
On another note, what about people without family? People whose parents die when they are grown. People who have no extended family, kids who age out of foster care. We are assuming in most of this course that all people have family. This is not true for many? Can you build your own family? Are there ways we can help a person create their own family or help support a person while they gather this social capital?
https://exploringyourmind.com/living-without-a-family/
Sometimes family members go to prison or get sick and die. Families move and people fall through the cracks.
Sometimes your family is toxic and you choose to not be with them.
This article had another point of view https://everydayfeminism.com/2015/04/people-with-no-family/ This is very interesting and challenges our assumptions of how we treat people who have no family.
Family Dynamics and Social Support Networks
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |