Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Feature of Decision Making by Public Administrators
Briefly explain the concept of incremental choice as a core feature of decision making by public administrators Explain why collaboration is important for effective public management in the 21st century What is public interest and how can public interest
Briefly explain the concept of incremental choice as a core feature of decision making by public administrators Explain why collaboration is important for effective public management in the 21st century What is public interest and how can public interest be achieved by public administrators Define public service culture and explain if public service motives are exclusive to the public sector Identify the key decision makers in public agencies and explain why political appointees are interested in decisions that yield short time results or outcomes.
Was Clinton to the left, right, or centrist? How do you support your answer?
Was Clinton to the left, right, or centrist? How do you support your answer? Was Clinton to the left, right, or centrist? How do you support your answer?
Feature of Decision Making by Public Administrators
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Feature of Decision Making by Public Administrators |
Feature of Decision Making by Public Administrators