Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
ECO535 Analysis of Federal Reserve and Great Recession
Assignment content review of resources of Wk 3. Assignment content review.
Select 1 of the following themes relating to the Great Recession:
Bubble home price, collapse, foreclosures, rescue of submarine mortgages
Subprime mortgages, FNMA, Freddie Mac and AIG bailouts
The financial crisis, the rescue of commercial and investment banks
Write a 350-to-700-word essay on 1 of the following Federal Reserve corrective initiatives following a crisis:
Quantitative facilitation
Purchase from financial institutions of hazardous assets
Payment of reserve balance interest
Address in your analysis the following:
Federal Reserve actions to ameliorate the crisis
How the corrective measures helped restore financial system stability
How should the corrective measure prevent a similar catastrophe from recurring
********
Note: The use of charts and graphs with suitable sources is welcomed. Any charts or charts taken from the SRB FRED site may only be provided if US government agencies such as the Bureau of Economic Analysis or the Bureau of Labor Statistics are the data sources used by FRED. *******
Cite a minimum of 2 academically credible sources.
Format your assignment to the APA criteria.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Analyze the Water Footprint Results