FedRAMP Security Assessment Report Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
FedRAMP Security Assessment Report Essay
RMF Step 4: Assessment
In Step 4, the Assessor (or Validator) reviews all the artifacts provided to determine the risk to the system. All of these findings are presented in the Security Assessment Report (SAR). There are many complex versions available, both government and commercial. These are great references for major projects, but you do not need to go into that much detail.
FedRAMP Security Assessment Report (SAR) Template, General Services Administration
https://www.fedramp.gov/assets/resources/templates/FedRAMP-SAR-Template.docx
Tips for Creating a Strong Cybersecurity Assessment Report, Lenny Zeltser
https://zeltser.com/security-assessment-report-cheat-sheet/
Assignment Requirements
Write an original SAR that captures all the work you have conducted on your University Administration Office. Do not use the full FedRamp template, as a minimum, you should include:
- An overview of your system – University Administration Office
- The scope and methodology of your assessment
- Your prioritized findings with recommended mitigations
Submission Requirements
Format: Microsoft Word
Font: Arial, 12-Point, Double- Space
Length: approximately 2-4 pages
Note: I have attached my previous RMF steps document for the University Admin Office
FedRAMP Security Assessment Report Essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow FedRAMP Security Assessment Report Essay