Field Readiness Essay Discussion Assignment
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Field Readiness Essay Discussion Assignment
Description
Description: This paper provides students with the opportunity to engage in a critical self-reflective process to determine their level of readiness prior to entering the field of social services in a professional capacity.
Instructions:
1. a. The intent of this paper is to increase your awareness of the qualities and behaviours considered necessary for a professional social service worker so that you know what behaviours you may need to work on to be ready for the field placement experience.
b. There are no right or wrong answers however you will be graded on your ability to selfreflect.
2. Read Information for Social Service Worker. Using critical self-reflection skills, answer the following questions in complete sentences and paragraphs (total of 5 pages). Please use headings to allow for greater organization of writing.
a. How ready are you feeling to work remotely? (think of practical, mental, and emotional readiness).
b. What challenges do you anticipate in applying communication skills when engaging with clients remotely?
c. How ready are you to work with minimal supervision? How do you plan to address this challenge?
d. What self-care mechanisms will you consider to maintain your mental, emotional and physical health when working remotely?
e. What strengths do you hold that will support your placement learning experience? (personality attributes, personal and professional skills, prior knowledge, etc.)
Field Readiness Essay Discussion Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction
45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Field Readiness Essay Discussion Assignment