Film Writing Assignment: Interpreting a Film of Your Choice
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Film Writing Assignment: Interpreting a Film of Your Choice
According to the textbook authors, when we watch a film, our participation is generally in two different ways:
Fantasy, in which we can imagine ourselves in the action
Acute awareness of the details presented in the film, and their relationships. This second type is centered on detail, structure, form.
Select a dramatic film that you like or are drawn to (**see note at the end of the assignment sheet for explanation of what a “dramatic” film is) Watch it, and participate with it, interpret it, using the following bullet points as guidelines:
Introduce the film. Tell me the title, who made it, who stars in it, and (BRIEFLY) what it’s about.
What do you notice/what stands out about the way the film is shot? Use the terminology from the text to make and support your answer.
What do you notice/what stands out about the way the film is edited (that is, how the narrative is edited together)? Again, use the terminology form the text to make and support your answer.
Does the way the film is shot/edited (the technique) supplement the story being told, or does it override the story/get in the way? Explain.
How does sound (including any music or score) function in the film? Explain.
If, as the textbook authors suggest, art “reveals values,” what values are being revealed by this film? To think about this another way, what is the central message being presented in the film? What are we supposed to take away from that message? How do you know? (Support your answer, fully). What social or historical context has given rise to the film that might help you answer this question? Explain.
What about your own experiences has drawn you to this film, and/or how have these experiences informed/affected how you see/experience the film? Explain.
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: Paper must be at least 750 words (roughly 3 double-spaced pages). Use 1-inch margins and a reasonably sized 12-pt. font. Please attempt to use proper MLA citations in your use of the textbook, in quoting the film, etc., and please provide a “works cited” page at the end which lists all the information for the film and any outside source material you use (this is not required, but it’s fine if you want to bring in some outside material). MAKE SURE YOU CITE THE FILM ITSELF. This is primarily YOUR response/interpretation of the film, however, so do NOT let outside material drown you out or make up the majority of your paper.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Film Writing Assignment: Interpreting a Film of Your Choice
Film Writing Assignment: Interpreting a Film of Your Choice