Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
FIN4634 Discussion of Finance Case Study
1. Describe the challenges or worries of the international trade buyers/importers and sellers/exporters.
2. Explain the business choice problem of Mohanty.
3. Explain the several payment solutions available to exporters and importers in the international company and their relative benefits and derivatives.
4. Explain the different international trade hazards. Identify similar hazards in domestic commerce and distinctive risks in foreign trade. Explain how these hazards are managed.
5. Identify the most important risk in dealing with new customers from rich countries. Explain the appropriate payment option for commercial mitigation (default risk). How should Mohanty handle her company’s commercial risk?
6. Explain the concept and mechanics in international affairs of the Documentary Letter of Credit (DLC) (see attached exhibit). How does a Documentary Letter of Credit (DLC) operate to strengthen importers’ credit and mitigate their credit risks?
7. Provide an explanation in depth of what you learned from the case.
*Instructions*
-Answers must be 1-7 numbers
-The applications must be 2-5 paragraphs
-From 17 February 2021 at 3pm
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Analyze the Water Footprint Results