Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Individual written job in Harvard style format, cover page, Table of Contents, text alignment, and Reference list for BCO125 Business Law Final Exam CASE STUDY COMMENTARY
The student must construct a logical argument or discussion in the form of an essay, assessing ideas and models. When giving instances, you can use ethical theories, legal cases, and case studies. Please cite all of your sources.
Students must use whole phrases and paragraphs while writing. There are no bullet points allowed. Allow for some breathing room between sentences.
Prepare paragraphs for the introduction, body, and conclusion.
It is necessary to use, identify, and properly cite sources.
Format: PDF submitted through Turnitin Based on the case study provided below, the answers should analyze the following: 1. Define the term “intellectual property.”
2. Explain to Carmen why it is a good idea for her to file a patent application for her innovation. How was she able to pull this off?
3. Carmen needed to figure out a way to safeguard her intellectual property rights in the children’s books as well.
4. Explain an intellectual property issue about music lyrics or literary works that involves copyright infringement.
5. Carmen receives a call from a customer who claims that several of the cooking utensils had broken while he was eating, the most recent of which wounded his mouth so badly that he required stitches. Do you think Carmen could be held liable for her actions?
Provide a well-thought-out response, backed up by a legal case or cases.
6. Determine what Carmen can do if she believes the other company has plagiarized her design and analyze her options.
Week 13 – Due by 23:59 on Sunday, May 9th, 2021 through Moodle. cccc Word count: 1000-1500 The overall word count excludes the cover, table of contents, references, and appendix.
Arial 11 points font
Justified text alignment
The bibliography and in-text references must follow Harvard’s citation style.
Weight: This task accounts for 40% of your overall grade in this class.
Outcomes: This activity evaluates the following learning outcomes: LO1: recognize the importance of ethics in the workplace.
LO2: in the decision-making process, detect ethical problems.
LO3: identify and evaluate the ethical theories that can be used to justify a business choice.
CASE STUDY Carmen has spent the last three years developing an environmentally friendly dishwashing liquid and cooking utensils in order to help people lessen their negative environmental impact. The cooking utensils are manufactured from pinewood that has been responsibly obtained. Her company will be known as CleanStart*. Carmen has also created several children’s books that emphasize the significance of “Starting Clean” at a young age.
Carmen’s creations have been tremendously successful due to consumer interest in using green products. They’ve grown in popularity to the point where they’re now sold in major retailers and have established themselves as the go-to brand for environmentally friendly cleaning goods. Furthermore, as the items became more well-known, demand for Carmen’s Eco education children’s books grew, eventually expanding to include CleanStart* activity books, online games, and stationary.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Final Exam for BCO125 Business Law