Finding, organizing, appraising, and synthesizing of scholarly evidence essay

Finding, organizing, appraising, and synthesizing of scholarly evidence essay

Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839

Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages: 5-10

Instructions:

Finding, organizing, appraising, and synthesizing of scholarly evidence essay

POPULATING AN EVIDENCE TABLE
Introduction
Finding, organizing, appraising, and synthesizing evidence are all essential skills that scholar-practitioners must master. An excellent tool to facilitate these tasks is an evidence table, which enables you to capture and summarize key information from multiple sources and serves as a concise and well-organized overview of the literature.
Becoming familiar with the evidence table and its use now will prove invaluable as you progress through your program and begin working on your doctoral capstone project. Using the evidence table to document and analyze the evidence you’ve gathered in a literature search will enable you to develop a coherent synthesis of your findings.
Preparation
Compile the peer-reviewed studies you’ve collected over the past five weeks as you’ve researched organizational challenges that present opportunities for evidence-based improvement.
Instructions
Analyze the peer-reviewed research studies you’ve collected and add key information to the Evidence Table [XLSX]. Then, critically appraise three of the studies and synthesize your findings.
Unused columns on the worksheet can be hidden from view. This five-minute video shows you how to hide and unhide columns in an Excel worksheet.
• Henderson, K. (2018). Deleting and hiding Excel 2016 data [Video]. Skillsoft.
Requirements
The assignment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
• Analyze each peer-reviewed research study.
o At a minimum, add the following information to your evidence table:
? APA Source Reference.
? Aim, Hypothesis, or Research Question.
? Research Design/Methodology.
? Measurement Method.
? Sample Population or Setting.
? Research Variables.
? Data Analysis.
? Findings.
• Critically appraise each peer-reviewed study.
o Address each study’s methodology, research questions, theoretical basis, findings, and possible application.
o Do not accept articles at face value.
• Synthesize the findings from your analysis and critical appraisal of the studies.
o Explain how these sources relate to one another.
? Identify commonalities and differences in research questions, methodologies, and findings.
? Consider both supporting and opposing points of view.
• Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.

Finding, organizing, appraising, and synthesizing of scholarly evidence essay

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Finding, organizing, appraising, and synthesizing of scholarly evidence essay

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!