Finding Personal Satisfaction and Clout Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Finding Personal Satisfaction and Clout Assignment
Coercive power, reward power, legitimate power, referent power, and expert power are used in many organizations.
I have had enough life experience to identify each and know that I have experienced all of them. Coercive power in the form of employee handbooks and by-laws within the organization are the most obvious forms I can recall.
Reward Power takes place when you use safety bonuses, fuel bonuses, or some other form of reward to influence certain behaviors. Legitimate power comes when you appoint someone and state the scope of their authority within an organization.
Reverent power comes in the form of a charismatic leader who can influence the behavior of people through their actions and speech. Expert power comes from having the wisdom, knowledge, and talent relevant to the tasks and identified and respected by those involved and comes with a lot of weight when it comes to decision making.
In my experience, most of these power theories are a mix of need and ego-driven. For example, a 30-year veteran in my workplace is going to have the skills that are needed for training and passing on knowledge while also finding personal satisfaction and clout from being able to do so. This can apply to each of these theories.
Finding Personal Satisfaction and Clout Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Finding Personal Satisfaction and Clout Assignment
Finding Personal Satisfaction and Clout Assignment