For Healthcare Executives, An Issue Brief

July 16, 2021

For Healthcare Executives, An Issue Brief

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

For Healthcare Executives: An Issue Brief

Competency

Examine the roles and effects of different stakeholders in the US healthcare system.

Criteria for Student Success
Select the This item is graded with a rubric link in the Details & Information window to see the grading rubric for this deliverable.

Scenario
You have been advised to apply for the position of Director of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) because of your background as an expert consultant for the agency. You have an interview set with top government healthcare officials, and you must provide material on the responsibilities and impacts your future stakeholders will have on healthcare.

Instructions
Examine the impact of different stakeholders on balancing quality, accessibility, and costs. Include the following stakeholders in your research:

Patients
Families of patients
PhysicianssEmployers
Companies that provide insurance
Pharmaceutical companies
Government
In a detailed problem brief, report your findings on each stakeholder’s role and impact on the US healthcare system, including ideas for reforms each stakeholder can make to improve quality, access, and costs.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met