Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Framework (theoretical and conceptual)
The next stage is to explore what form of theoretical or conceptual framework would be appropriate for your topic of interest after reading and examining the differences and similarities between theoretical and conceptual frameworks from various sources.
Please keep in mind that this is not always simple or obvious, as finding a theory or idea paper that completely matches your topic is an uncommon occurrence. Consult the Walden Library to come up with unique keywords and search tactics that will result in a scholarly article (or papers) on your topic.
In this discussion, you will look at qualitative research’s theoretical and conceptual underpinnings.
To get ready for this discussion, do the following:
Consider how a conceptual framework differs from a theoretical framework in the Grant and Osanloo essay about conceptual and theoretical frameworks in the Learning Resources.
Use the Course Guide and Assignment Help to choose a theoretical or conceptual framework-based research article on your topic of interest. (Note: This might be the same article you used for your Annotated Bibliography in last week’s Assignment.)
On Day 4,
Explain how Grant and Osanloo (2014) define the differences between a conceptual and a theoretical framework in your own words. Use examples from the article and your own texts to back up your claims.
Make sure to mention the week’s Learning Resources and other academic material in your main and response posts in APA format.
By the sixth day,
Clarify or expand your grasp of the conceptual and theoretical frameworks in response to one of your colleagues’ posts. Use an article on your topic of interest that uses a theoretical or conceptual framework as an example.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Framework theoretical and conceptual