Friend Of Antoine Roquentin’s Philosophical Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Friend Of Antoine Roquentin’s Philosophical Discussion
Description
For this forum, you will be yourself. However, pretend that you are a friend of Antoine Roquentin’s and he has come to you for advice. He has tried to explain the feeling of nausea to you and has described a typical day in his life. Now, he is asking you for some wisdom regarding how he can improve himself and his life. Friend Of Antoine Roquentins Philosophical Discussion
- You will respond to your character portrayal last week. Copy and Paste your discussion post from last week in this forum. Friend Of Antoine Roquentins Philosophical Discussion
- Your response should be a minimum of 300 words.
- Make sure and refer to parts of the book as well as what he has told you. Your wisdom should at least in part come form pointing out things in the book that might not have been noticed by him. You are allowed to have your own perspective on what would be best for him, of course. Just make sure that you incorporate aspects of the book in your response.
Friend Of Antoine Roquentins Philosophical Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow