Fundamentals of Leadership Discussion Assignment Project Term Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Fundamentals of Leadership Discussion Assignment Project Term Paper
Assessment Task Individual essay No organisation can be successful without effective leadership. Effective leaders understand the relationship between themselves, their followers and the situation or context in which they are leading.
Drawing on published academic theory and research, critically evaluate what distinguishes a leader from an effective leader.
Your essay must include discussion of:
Approaches to leadership
Communication and leading a virtual team
Motivating followers and managing diversity
Leaders’ emotional intelligence and reflection
Word Count: 2500 words Task specific guidance: ·
This assessment is 70% of your grade for this module. ·
Your answer should include all of the required four areas of discussion, plus a conclusion to draw your essay together. ·
Your essay should draw on material from across the module to demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of Fundamentals of Leadership. ·
Your answer should be supported by academic theory and research, and evidence of wider reading that demonstrates your understanding and use of published academic research. ·
This is an academic essay and therefore you should not select a particular leader or organisation on which to base your essay. You may wish to provide examples to support your arguments. ·
You should demonstrate your ability to critically evaluate.Word count: Guidance on the use of word count: –
Introduction (approx. 150 words) –
Approaches to leadership (approx. 650 words) –
Communication and leading a virtual team (approx. 500 words) –
Motivating followers and managing diversity (approx. 500 words) –
Emotional intelligence and reflection (approx. 500 words) –
Conclusion (approx. 200 words)
The assessment task provides approximate word count per section. As this is an essay you should not include a contents page or any figures or tables. The word count includes everything from the first word of the introduction to the final word of your conclusion. The reference list is not included in the word count. There should be no appendices.General study guidance: · Cite all information used in your work which is clearly from a source. Try to ensure that all sources in your reference list are seen as citations in your work, and all names cited in the work appear in your reference list. Reference and cite your work in accordance with the APA 7th system – the University’s chosen referencing style.
Fundamentals of Leadership Discussion Assignment Project Term Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow