Gene editing in synthetic organisms
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Gene editing in synthetic organisms
Gene editing refers to the process of making precise changes to an organism’s DNA. The process of gene editing has revolutionized the field of biotechnology and has tremendous implications for various industries including agriculture, medicine, and synthetic biology. In the case of synthetic biology, gene editing is used to create organisms that have a specific desired trait or characteristic. These organisms are known as synthetic organisms.
The most well-known method of gene editing is called CRISPR-Cas9, which is a genetic engineering tool that allows for the precise and efficient modification of DNA sequences. The CRISPR-Cas9 system uses a molecule called RNA, which acts as a guide, to direct the Cas9 enzyme to the specific location in the DNA where the desired change is to be made. Once the Cas9 enzyme is in place, it acts as a pair of molecular scissors that cut the DNA at the desired location. This cut creates a gap in the DNA that triggers the cell’s natural repair mechanisms. The researchers then provide a template of the desired change, which the cell uses to repair the cut and incorporate the new DNA sequence.
In synthetic biology, the goal of gene editing is often to create organisms that can perform specific functions or produce specific substances. For example, scientists might modify the DNA of yeast to produce biofuels or drugs, or they might modify the DNA of bacteria to clean up pollutants in the environment. In agriculture, gene editing is being used to develop crops that are resistant to pests, drought, and disease, which can increase yields and improve food security.
Gene editing has the potential to have a significant impact on the world, but it is not without its ethical and safety concerns. The main concern is that the changes made to an organism’s DNA could have unintended consequences, such as the creation of new diseases or the disruption of ecosystems. It is also important to consider the ethical implications of creating synthetic organisms and the potential for these organisms to be used for malicious purposes.
In conclusion, gene editing in synthetic organisms is a rapidly developing field with the potential to revolutionize various industries. However, it is important to approach this technology with caution and to consider the ethical and safety implications of creating synthetic organisms. Further research and regulation will be necessary to ensure that gene editing is used in a responsible and sustainable manner.
Gene editing in synthetic organisms
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow