Global Campus Employee Job Satisfaction Business Questions Solution 1

September 18, 2022

Global Campus Employee Job Satisfaction Business Questions

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Global Campus Employee Job Satisfaction Business Questions

Working together in groups requires cooperating and collaborating with others. It also requires motivation. Click here to watch the video, “What makes us feel good about our work?”

Respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas:

Have you been a part of or watched an amazing team or a terrible team? Could be a group or team at work, in your community, or participating in a hobby. Describe the team.

What contributed to the team being positive or negative? In your opinion, why were the contributions positive or negative?

don

Employee job satisfaction depends on many factors, including communication techniques and the organizational culture within an organization. A manager in a large organization has a reputation for being unapproachable and rarely communicates with their team. Their management approach is, “If you need to know, then I’ll tell you.”

What impact would the manager’s communication style have on the team?

How would the manager’s communication style affect your own job satisfaction?

What kinds of communication techniques could the manager use to be a more inspiring leader?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met