Global Foreign Exchange Trading Discussion

September 18, 2022

Global Foreign Exchange Trading Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Global Foreign Exchange Trading Discussion

Internationalization Essay

Instructions

Based on your area of interest and/or career goals, choose an organization (NGO or not-for-profit) and/or company and describe what it is that they do, and their purpose for existing.

Research and explain:

The issues they may be facing and their internationalization efforts and activities.

Controversies related to internationalization they may be facing. For example, what may be a reason/justification for them NOT to engage in these activities.

Describe efforts of their competitors in terms of global expansion, or is that industry or, product-line not suitable for other markets?

Global Foreign Exchange Trading Discussion

I’m working on a Business question and need guidance to help me study.

watch the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tezbnr1QJNI&feature=youtu.be

answer the question .

Questions that arise: Why does the dollar dominate trade even though alternate currencies are available (Euro, GBP, Yen and now Yuan (Renminbi). More so in swaps – when it should not really matter – Euro or GBP or Yen can be far more significant? What may explain it

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met