Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Global Forest Watch Database Worksheet
Global Forest Watch Database Worksheet
In typical years the entire ENVS&101 class participates in the annual fall Green Seattle Day, planting trees around the city in a variety of public and private lands. Green Seattle Day is organized by the Green Seattle Partnership and plants around 6000 trees in Seattle every year on that day. It’s fun and everyone learns how to plant trees and about urban forest conservation. Since I’ve been working for over a decade, it brings me enormous joy to see all the new forests growing in Seattle parks thanks in part to volunteers from this class. Lame COVID-19 and other things I won’t say about our national leadership has ruined Green Seattle Day and most tree planting events this year are canceled. If you are able to find an event through (they were at least canceled through October) or another agency, public or private, please participate in one of their events (typically 3-4 hours) and submit 3 photos and this event reflection. This is usually my favorite lab of the class (grumble, grumble).
Global Forest Watch Database Worksheet
Otherwise, complete the following lab which is still gets you outside with the trees but in a slightly less feel good – get dirty – have an impact way.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Global Forest Watch Database Worksheet |
Global Forest Watch Database Worksheet