Grading Criteria for Integrated Research Review Paper Final
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Grading Criteria for Integrated Research Review Paper Final
Criteria Possible Points Points Earned Comments Tittle Page: Formatted correctly 2 Abstract: Clear concise summary of the paper, identifies purpose, literature review & findings, 100-250 words, single paragraph, not indented, past tense. Include keywords section. 3 Introduction: Identifies nature & scope of the problem & significance of conducting the integrated research review to generate knowledge for nursing practice. 5 Background: provides background information, explains & defines problem, explains significance & importance of problem, defines terms if necessary. 10 Research Problem Statement: Indicates the gap in knowledge needed for nursing practice & provides a basis for the study purpose. 5 Research Purpose: Clear concise statement of the specific aim or goal of the study, one sentence. 2.5 Research Question: Clear, concise interrogative statement, written in present tense, using PICO format with a nursing focus 2.5 Research Utilization Model: Explains model, how it fits with and can be used for your proposed EBP change. Includes Simple Diagram updated with all research findings/outcomes. 5 Search Criteria and Results: Includes Data Research Table correctly cited in APA, includes search terms and results. Includes Literature Review Tables correctly attached and labeled as an Appendix and referenced in this section. General description of types of articles and level of evidence based on the Melnyk rating pyramid.
5 Findings: Combine & synthesize evidence from the literature to answer your research question that will support a practice recommendation. Describe overall strength/consistency of findings (important statistical data, levels of evidence, evidenced based tools or protocols, etc.) to support (or not support) the intervention. Discuss each article utilized in your paper to support your PICOT. Include research found on literature review tables and any additional research. Should have a minimum of 7 articles. 20 Discussion: ties together the other sections & gives them meaning, includes major findings, limitations of the reviewed studies, conclusions drawn from the findings, implications for nursing practice & recommendations for further research. 15 Recommendations for Nursing Practice: Based on your findings, what do you recommend for nursing practice? Should you implement a practice change & is further research needed?? Describe methods to make inclusive, equitable, and accessible for populations 10 Conclusion: Reviews major points of the paper and is a logical flow from the body of the paper. 5 References: Formatted and cited correctly 5 APA Format free of spelling and grammatical errors
5 Total Points Earned____________ (out of 100)
Grading Criteria for Integrated Research Review Paper Final
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow