HA 415 Health Care Policy and Economic Discussion

HA 415 Health Care Policy and Economic Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

HA 415 Health Care Policy and Economic Discussion

Imagine that you are a hospital administrator speaking to a stakeholder group of people in your community including local policymakers, leaders and concerned citizens about market failures and the role of government and address complex healthcare policies so they will understand how healthcare policy is created and helps them.

• You wish to address how your hospital would like to help the community address the opioid crisis affecting the community and region and explain how the community could help. Government intervention is based on the special interest or public interest theories. The public interest theory focuses on efficiency in the market and the special interest theory levels the playing field in the legislative marketplace.

4 parts of this assignment—use the items below as headers for each part—or name them if you give a speech:

1. Provide a description/analysis of current policies pertaining to the opioid crisis. 2. Explain some examples of opioid crisis that a policy analyst may consider. 3. Provide 3–5 options to address the opioid crisis in your community 4. Explain how you will evaluate the options listed in #3 to know if they are working on not. •

The paper should be written in APA format, include at least four references, and should be 3 pages in length not including the title and reference page. Use in-text citations for all references!

In your speech to stakeholders in the community you provide a policy analysis and provide informed advice that relates to a public policy decision and include a recommended course of action/inaction and should be framed by the client’s powers and values. In your speech to stakeholders, you explain some examples of the aspects of the problem that a policy analyst may consider.

Requirements

Writer explains that a policy analysis is an analysis that provides informed advice to a client that relates to a public policy decision and includes a recommended course of action/inaction and is framed by the client’s powers and values.

Writer explains some examples of the aspects of a problem that a policy analyst may consider.

Writer explains the policy analysis should provide 3–5 options for a client to consider.

Writer explains some potential criteria for evaluating your policy options.

Please be sure to review the various Academic Tools to assist you with meeting APA expectations for written Assignments.

Criterion 1: Policy analysis with informed advice to a client with a recommended course of action within a client’s powers and values. Depicts all of the following elements: ● Explains informed advice in an analysis. ● Includes the advice to a client that relates to a public policy decision. ● Includes a recommended course of action. ● Analysis is framed by the client’s powers and values.

Criterion 2: Explains the aspects of a problem that a policy analyst may consider Explains three examples of the aspects of a problem that a policy analyst may consider.

Criterion 3: Client Options Provides four or five options for a client to consider.

Criterion 4: Potential criteria for evaluating your policy options. Provides four or five potential criteria for evaluating your policy options.

Criterion 5 Academic references with in-text citations. ● Includes four academic references from multiple outside sources and/or course materials as required.

HA 415 Health Care Policy and Economic Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!