HA405 Leadership and Ethics in Health Care

July 12, 2021

HA405 Leadership and Ethics in Health Care

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Identifying Bioethical Issues This activity will have you identify and evaluate a bioethical issue facing healthcare administrations and discuss how you would handle the issue. Unit Outcomes addressed in this Assignment: Examine bioethical issues in healthcare. Course Outcomes addressed in this Assignment: HA405-2: Explain a bioethical issue within a healthcare facility. Instructions: In this unit, you will identify and evaluate one bioethical health care issue facing healthcare administrators. In a 1-page summary, you will identify bioethical issues and discuss how you would effectively and ethically handle the issues in your facility.
Include two (2) academic references and submit your assignment in APA format. Requirements: Choose one (1) bioethical issue to research. (For example, Euthanasia, End-of-life care, Eugenics, Medical resource allocation, Stem Cells, Substance abuse (excessive opioid scripting), Genetic manipulation, Cloning, etc.). Identify the issue and its implications and status in health care. Discuss how you would effectively and ethically handle the issue in your facility as the administrator. Include two (2) academic references formatted in APA.
Submitting your work: Submit your Assignment to the appropriate Dropbox. Please be sure to download the file Writing Center Resources from Course Documents to assist you with meeting APA expectations for written Assignments. To view your graded work, come back to the Dropbox or go to the Gradebook after your instructor has evaluated it. Make sure that you save a copy of your submitted work.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met