Harsha Paper Discussion Essay Assignment
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Harsha Paper Discussion Essay Assignment
Discuss the following, supplying citations to support any information that you provide. Do not include your opinion, only what you can support with a citation. Address the following topics.
How does Application Security relate to software development?
Define application and software development
Briefly describe the role of application security in software development
Discuss two software development approaches
For each briefly discuss the high-level principles/approach
Discuss how Application Security should be included in each phase/step of the approaches
Discuss what elements of the application should be addressed and how. Examples: data at rest, data in motion, identity management, etc.
Discuss the potential downfalls that can occur if Application Security is not integrated with application development
For all writing assignments ensure that you do the following:
Write 1000 to 1500 words in APA format.
Utilize at least five scholarly references.
Note that scholarly references do not include Wikipedia, .COM websites, blogs, or other non-peer reviewed sources.
Utilize Google Scholar and/or the university library.
Do not copy and paste bulleted lists. Instead, read the material and in your words, describe the recommendation citing the source.
Review the rubric to see how you will be graded.
Plagiarism will result in a zero for the assignment.
The second instance of plagiarism will result in your failure of this class.
If you use a source, cite it. If you do not, it is plagiarism.
Harsha Paper Discussion Essay Assignment
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Harsha Paper Discussion Essay Assignment