Hazard Mitigation Essay Paper Discussion

November 9, 2022

Hazard Mitigation Essay Paper Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Hazard Mitigation Essay Paper Discussion

Hazard mitigation is a very involved process with many steps. While it is beyond the scope of our class to develop a full blown hazard mitigation plan, you will have the opportunity to exercise some of the component parts by addressing the mitigation of a particular hazard. Here is the assignment: (Which will be due by Sunday, February 20th at midnight)

Choose one of the listed hazards below to report on. In other words, you will be constructing a mini hazard mitigation plan for one of these specific hazards.

HURRICANE

TORNADO

WILDFIRE

FLOODING

TERRORISM

NUCLEAR ACCIDENT

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RELEASE

HEAT WAVE

Your task will be to select one of the hazards and tell, in an APA formatted paper (10 to 15 pages in length, not including title page, or reference pages), how you would work to mitigate this type of hazard in the future in your community. If there is another hazard not listed that you would like to address, send the instructor an email for approval. Remember, you are reporting on a hazard type not on a specific incident or occurrence. You can cite information from specific events but the focus is on mitigating the hazard type.

Categories to be addressed shall include:

Introduction – This should provide a synopsis of the issue at hand requiring mitigation action and who should be involved.

Problem description – A description of the hazard including the impact on property and the community (especially safety and health) should be given.

Community Considerations – Other community considerations that come into play such as recreation needs, environment and ecology, economic development, etc. should be discussed.

Goals and Objectives

Alternative methods that could be used to mitigate the hazard.

Recommended measures including a description, objectives, who will be responsible, a time schedule, what agencies should be involved and how much the project will cost (i.e. a budget).

Implementation process

Evaluation and revision process.

IMPORTANT: For further guidance on how a plan should be written, what it should include, etc. it is strongly recommended that you reference the document titled: “Hazard Mitigation Planning Made Easy” located under the Module 1 assignments page.

Hazard Mitigation Essay Paper Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met

You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow