HCS 446 Bariatric Unit Facility Planning Presentation Solution

October 25, 2022

HCS 446 Bariatric Unit Facility Planning Presentation

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

HCS 446 Bariatric Unit Facility Planning Presentation

Congratulations, you have been promoted to lead project manager (PM) to oversee a bariatric facility adjacent to the hospital campus.

The executive stakeholder is the hospital’s chief financial officer (CFO), and as the lead PM, you will work closely with the director of facilities. You created a team consisting of a cross-functional group of hospital stakeholders and members of the community.

As you and your team start to work, you find that the standards for developing a bariatric unit are not as well-defined as other units. Your team has several opinions for what this unit may look like and work together to create a presentation that will satisfy the investor’s needs. As a team, research bariatric units and how they are designed in a hospital setting.
Create a presentation that showcases your team’s facility to the investors.

Analyze essential environmental elements in bariatric facility design that would be important to the community stakeholders.

Differentiate the facility equipment and technology used within a bariatric facility for your clinical stakeholders.

Analyze the use of community demographics and accessibility in facility planning for your bariatric facility.

Explain to your financial stakeholders the importance of creating a facility based on the needs of your bariatric patients.

This is my part I am supposed to do . Analyze essential environmental elements in bariatric facility design that would be important to the community stakeholders.

HCS 446 Bariatric Unit Facility Planning Presentation

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met