Health and Medical Working Capital Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Health and Medical Working Capital Discussion
I’m working on a health & medical question and need guidance to help me learn.
Working capital, or actual cash available for spending, is the key to a successful organization. In a healthcare organization, it is important to determine how much cash is available to run the day-to-day operations. For this Discussion, you analyze the working capital of a healthcare organization of your choice.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Identify one example of an event that has changed the operations of your organization or an organization with which you are familiar. If you are not currently working in a healthcare organization (HCO), you may choose a case study from a reliable source from which to work.
Review this week’s Reading and Learning Resources.
Post a cohesive response to the following:
Describe the organization you have chosen and describe and assess its working capital and strategies to improve to deal with market conditions such as the transition to a value-based care reimbursement payment system. Justify your conclusion.
Health and Medical Working Capital Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow