Health policy and politics: A nurse's guide Assignment

January 7, 2022

Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide Assignment

Answer the discussion and at least 2 references.

It is the responsibility of nurses to be cognizant of their state’s regulations in relation to their area of specialization. It is worth noting that every state has separate rules and regulations that tend to vary significantly.

In this post, I will list some of the unique variations that exist in nursing guidelines between the state of Mississippi and my home state of Missouri.

Having worked in both Missouri and Mississippi, I have come to the realization that not all state permits APRNs (Advanced Practice Registered Nurses) to practice to the complete extent of their education and licensure. One major barrier preventing APRNs from practicing to the full extent of their education and license revolves around the conflicting clauses in the federal and state scope of practices (Milstead & Short, 2019).

According to the Missouri State Board of Nursing, APRNS that wish to offer prescription services for controlled substances are required by the BON to complete an equivalent of three semesters of Advanced Pharmacology course that is provided by faculties accredited by the Board (Missouri Nursing Board, 2021).

Other requirements include 3000 hours of mentorship training with drugs, medicines, and therapeutic devices, agreeing with a physician with an unrestricted drug enforcement agency (DEA) number, and being engaged in the same practice (Missouri Nursing Board, 2021).

These requirements differ substantially from Mississippi’s Board of Nursing that mandates that all APRNs to have all the requisite training and collaboration that the state of Missouri requires in addition to 720 hours of supervised practice alongside pharmacology training that can be achieved by pharmacology coursework incorporated into the advanced practice program.

The other distinctive difference can be seen from the lens of educational requirements. In Mississippi, an APRN must possess a Master’s degree in addition to clinical experience alongside national accreditation through an association approved by the Board (Mississippi Board of Nursing, 2018).

Meanwhile, in Missouri, individuals are considered APRNs if licensed registered nurses and have recognition documents that qualify them to that particular role.

Essentially, this means that APRNs are acknowledged based on the federal advanced practice certification and must meet the educational needs stipulated by the Board.

References

Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Mississippi Board of Nursing. (2018). Advanced Practice Registered Nurse | Mississippi Board of Nursing. Ms.gov. https://www.msbn.ms.gov/licensure/advanced-practice-registered-nurse

Missouri Nursing Board. (2021). APRN license requirements. Mo.gov. https://www.pr.mo.gov/nursing.asp

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met

You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow