Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Healthcare Related Issues Discussion Assignment Paper
Comment this please***
A DNP is a Doctor of Nursing Practice. The main difference is that with a DNP they are focused more on clinical practice while the PhD is research based. DNP is a good path for nurses who have career goals to enhance their clinical practice and are MSN prepared. The PhD path would be beneficial for the nurse wanting to be in a leadership and research type position.
With a PhD the nurse is using a lot of evidenced based practice to come up with policies and procedures. Their goals is to improve patient outcomes with research findings. The DNP curriculum would work on a capstone project to enhance the clinical setting for a patient. The PhD curriculum includes more research and a teaching opportunity without patient clinical hours (Androus, 2020).
If I was going to further pursue an advanced degree after my bachelor’s in nursing science I would probably go with the PhD because I am more intrigued behind the research aspect of evidence based care. I also like teaching and that clinical hours aren’t required.
Reference:
Androus, A. (2020, February 24). Comparing a PhD vs DNP in Nursing || RegisteredNursing.org. Retrieved May 19, 2020, from https://www.registerednursing.org/answers/differen…
Healthcare Related Issues Discussion Assignment Paper
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Healthcare Related Issues Discussion Assignment Paper |
Healthcare Related Issues Discussion Assignment Paper