Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Healthcare System Compared Discussion Study Paper
Hi, please, respond to peers in about 100 words minimum with 2 credible references.
Peer 1:
Very well explained post. Here I would like to add a comparison of the health care systems in Canada, Germany, and the United States that has been conducted. The government’s role, as well as financing and payment mechanisms, are subject to some variations, as is the degree of centralization. The United States is the country that spends the most on health care. It would seem that systems that ration care are associated with lower per capita cosAccording to both theory and observation, waiting times tend to be shorter in the largely private system in the United States than in rationed systems. The health system in the US has been regarded as unsatisfactory by more Americans than in Canada or Germany. Approximately 40 million Americans do not have health insurance, the biggest gap in the American system. The uninsured do not necessarily go without care, but they consume half as much health care as insured individuals. (Ridic et al., 2012)
According to a study, the United States spends the most per capita in absolute terms among the three countries. The United States spends the highest proportion of its GDP on health care. In Germany, a universal health insurance system is operated without the long lines that plague government systems. Over the past few decades, costs per capita have increased faster than incomes per capita, leading to strenuous reforms in the 1990s. It is widely believed that Canada has developed a comprehensive and universal national health insurance program that is both popular and cost-effective. Canadian health care is more affordable, offers more services, is provided without financial barriers, and has a better health status than US healthcare. The life expectancy of Canadians and Germans is higher than that of US residents. In Canada, the difference may be explained partially by the failure to account for capital costs of Canadian hospitals, a higher proportion of elderly in the United States, and a higher level of research and development expenditures in the United States. It is important to note that data from different countries may not be directly comparable for several reasons, so it should be viewed with some skepticism. (Blendon et al., 1990)
Canadians, Germans, and a substantial segment of the United States population consider that substantial and fundamental changes need to be made to their health care systems. The three health care systems discussed above are undergoing constant changes and improvements, and all of them strive to minimize costs, improve quality, and increase access to health care. Achieving this goal or coming close to it is something they can only hope for. Health care in these three countries consumes a large portion of the economic pie, and the importance of health care is only going to grow in the coming years. As a result, it will be fascinating to see how Canada, Germany, and the United States develop and improve their health care systems in the coming years. (Ridic et al., 2012)
References
Blendon, R. J., Leitman, R., & Donelan, K. (1990, Summer). Satisfaction with health systems in ten nations. National Library of Mediine, 9(2), 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.9.2.185
Ridic, G., Gleason, S., & Ridic, O. (2012). Comparisons of Health Care Systems in the United States, Germany and Canada. Journal of Academy of Medical science of Bosnia, 24(2), 112-120. https://doi.org/: 10.5455/msm.2012.24.112-120
Peer 2:
Thank you for your post! How does the country you selected compare to other countries presented in this forum?
Peer 3:
Hi, great post. As we know there is no “perfect” healthcare as far as people are concerned. The Canadian healthcare system has its drawbacks as well as the United States (U. S.). Take for instance before the COVID-19 pandemic only 49% of the U.S. citizens considered that their health insurance was average or about above average. However, Canadians make up 1/10 of the U.S. population and there were fewer COVD-19 cases. Furthermore, during the pandemic the Canadians were all insured, the Canadians that were admitted to the hospitals for care did not have to worry about a bill. The hospitals worked off a single insurer for the medical care, Canadians consider this strength, while the U.S. has uninsured people (Santhanan, 2020).
Reference
Santhanan, L. (2020, August 31). How Canada got Universal Healthcare and What the U.S. Could Learn. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/how-canada-got…
Explanation & Answer:
100 Words
Tags: united states healthcare system
Healthcare System Compared Discussion Study Paper
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Healthcare System Compared Discussion Study Paper |
Healthcare System Compared Discussion Study Paper