Healthcare System in The Pandemic Coverage Map Discussion
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Healthcare System in The Pandemic Coverage Map Discussion
The journal entries each week will be directly related to the topics we cover in that Module. Unlike discussion postings, these are visible only to the student writing the entry and the instructor. Other students will not be able to view journal entries. I expect that your journal entries will be original, thoughtful, and meaningful and they should be well-written with correct grammar and structure. Please support your journal entries with ideas from our discussions, news articles, and other academic sources of your choosing. Your entries should be in the range of 400-500 words (longer is fine if you want to elaborate on a point but short can also be good). They will be due before the start of our next class.
Here is this week’s Journal topic:
Do you believe that the Biden Administration is taking the right steps to close the “coverage gap” in Medicaid, especially when we consider the dramatic impact on our healthcare system during the pandemic?
Healthcare System in The Pandemic Coverage Map Discussion
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow