High School Volleyball Case Study

June 4, 2022

High School Volleyball Case Study

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

High School Volleyball Case Study

Level: High School

Current Season: Just finished HS season and is transitioning to club v-ball season

Assessments:

Good power: Vertical Reach 10’3, Vertical 26.3 R leg vert 13.4, left side vert 16.3 and broad jump 7’7 right broad jump 6’1, left broad jump 5’8

Speed: 10-yard dash 2.1s, t drill 11.02

Conditioning: 300-yard shuttle 77 seconds

Relative strength is poor

Background: Lifts on and off due to the demands of the sport. She is now at a new club in which lifting is mandatory

Complete the following:

Sport Analysis:

Training Objectives:

Periodization Model:

Injury risk of sport:

Metabolic Demands of sport:

Weakness of the athlete:

High School Volleyball Case Study

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met