Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Hiring Manager Challenge Report Template
Dear Ms. Bigwig,
You asked me to review the applicant pool for the open Community Relations Coordinator position. After reviewing the job ad carefully and reading each of the applicants resumes, these are my recommendations:
We should interview [Name A] and [Name B]. As I ranked the applicants, [Name A] earned the highest position on my list because [Provide at least three sentences that contain detailed reasons for your choice] The next highest ranked applicant is Name B. This candidate is my second choice because [Provide at least three sentences that contain detailed reasons for your choice].
You asked for the person who I ranked at the bottom of my list. I want to eliminate [Name C] from further consideration by the City of Plantation because [Provide at least three sentences that contain detailed reasons for your choice].
Thank you for trusting me to exercise sound professional judgement in making these selections.
Best regards,
[Your name]
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Hiring Manager Challenge Report