Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
HIS 301 Supreme Court Decisions on the Bill of Rights
HIS/301: United States Constitution
Wk. 4 – Signature Assignment: Supreme Court Decisions on the Bill of Rights [due Mon]
Assignment Content
This assignment is designed to help you analyze civil liberties found in the U.S. Bill of Rights (i.e., the first ten amendments) and the role of the U.S. Supreme Court in upholding them through landmark cases. A landmark case is one where the Supreme Court’s ruling has historical significance because it defines what the amendment means/how it is applied. _____________________________
ASSIGNMENT
From the list below pick one topic as the primary subject of your assignment: Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, or Privacy/Law Enforcement Warrants.
Within your selected topic, choose *three* of the landmark cases/rulings listed.
Analyze how the three cases apply to the topic.
Topic: First Amendment – Freedom of Speech and Free Expression
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018)
Elonis v. United States (2015)
Reed v. Town of Gilbert (2015)
United States v. Alvarez (2012)
Topic: First Amendment – Freedom of Religion
American Legion v. American Humanist Association (2019)
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014)
Everson v. Board of Education (1947)
West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette (1943)
Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940)
Topic: Fourth Amendment & Privacy / Law Enforcement Warrants
Carpenter v. United States (2018)
United States v. Jones (2012)
Kyllo v. United States (2001)
United States v. Knotts (1982)
Terry v. Ohio (1968)
Katz v. United States (1967)
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Olmstead v. United States (1928)
Choose Submission Format – select one
Create a 10- to 12 slide presentation (Microsoft® PowerPoint® or a program of your choice) with speaker notes in a separate word document. Do not put your speaker’s notes into the notes section of PowerPoint; Blackboard’s inline grading feature cannot read them and therefore I cannot see them.
Write an 875-word paper.
Argument Structure
Introduction – what topic is your presentation or paper about? What topic and three cases will you analyze?
Summarize the details of the cases chosen. What happened? Who sued and why? How did the cases reach the Supreme Court?
Explain which of the U.S. Bill of Rights applied to the facts of the cases.
Evaluate how the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in each case and why. What is it about each case that makes it a landmark ruling? Discuss whether or not you think the Court’s interpretation of the specific amendment from the U.S. Bill of Rights was correct in the rulings, and why.
Discuss how the three cases relate to the topic, do they work together to limit a right or protect a right?
Conclusion – summarize the main points of your presentation or paper.
Reference list – list the sources you used in your presentation or paper.
HIS 301 Supreme Court Decisions on the Bill of Rights
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
HIS 301 Supreme Court Decisions on the Bill of Rights |
HIS 301 Supreme Court Decisions on the Bill of Rights