Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
HIST 326 UMGC Polybius Theory of Anacyclosis
what you have written is rather confusing. Let’s start with the basics. What is Polybius’ theory of anacyclosis? Can you explain the theory? What according to Polybius is the distinguishing factor between good forms of government (monarchy, aristocracy and democracy) and bad forms (tyranny, oligarchy and ochlocracy)?
Reply:
, I am not quite sure how to respond. You seem to be basing your comments on a book review by Anton J. L. van Hooff (2009, not 2019) of Spartacus. Film and History by M. M. Winkler. This is not one of our required readings and is only partially pertinent to the subject we are discussing. Your only reference to Margaret Malamud betrays no evidence that you have actually read her article, the required reading. I suggest that you read the article and revise your post.
Reply
this is was the response for discussion 7:
, Velleius Paterculus [Roman History 2.33] wrote, “In fact Pompey, from the time when he first took part in public life, could not brook an equal at all. In undertakings in which he should have been merely the first he wished to be the only one. No one was ever more indifferent to other things or possessed a greater craving for glory; he knew no restraint in his quest for office, though he was moderate to a degree in the exercise of his powers.” Granted that the process of Rome’s political decay had started well before Pompey, how much was Pompey’s own character and personality responsible for accelerating the process?
Reply:
Discussion 8 response:
technically, the Maison Carrée is a pseudo-peripteral temple, a form that would not function well as a governmental office building. How did the temple actually function? That is, what activities occurred there and where in the building did, they happen? What features make it seem, at least at first glance, impractical for adaptation to governmental/administrative use?
HIST 326 UMGC Polybius Theory of Anacyclosis
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
HIST 326 UMGC Polybius Theory of Anacyclosis |
HIST 326 UMGC Polybius Theory of Anacyclosis