Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
HIST 381 The Second Indochina
How was this, the Second Indochina war, fought?
What was the purpose of the fight [from all the various people who fought; 1. RVN, 2. the USA, 3. North Vietnam, 4. the NLF…]?
Strategy and tactics: America, Saigon [ARVN and the other forces part of Saigon government], and the NLF and the North Vietnam regulars employed in Vietnam will be the focus.
some thinking points for this….
What is the difference between strategy and tactics?
What was [were] the objectives of the NLF? The North Vietnamese?
What was North Vietnamese Army Group 559?
What was [were] the objectives of the Saigon government[s]?
Of the Americans [during both the advisory period and after American combat troops were sent in in 1965]? What was MAAG and MACV?
Why was the decision made to fight a “big war” by the American Army?
Why were the successes of programs such as at Buon Enao in Darlac Province, the CIDG, the US Marines Operation Golden Fleece [and the Marines’ small unit tactics], etc. not recognized and built on?
Why did the American command refuse to see anything but progress and roses in Vietnam from the beginning? General Paul Harkins said: “…accentuate the positive and eliminate the negative” after the Battle of Ap Bac. [ p 81 The Army and Vietnam]
Did the overwhelming power, and firepower, of ARVN the USA make any difference? Did air power [both helicopters and bombers]?
Search and destroy?
The use of herbicides?
How did the NLF, the VC, fight? How did the North Vietnamese regulars fight?
What was the nature of battle? See for example just a few: Ap Bac. Song Be. Ia Drang. Plei Mei. Dong Ha. Khe Sanh. The Tet offensive. Khe Sanh again.
And a thousand others. 1100 words using APA format
https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/pentagon/doc95.htm
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1961-63v03/d26
Ia Drang Valley: Where the US truly went to war – Vietnam at 50 – 1965 – Stripes
HIST 381 The Second Indochina
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
HIST 381 The Second Indochina |
HIST 381 The Second Indochina