History 115 section 7440 Essay Discussion

 History 115 section 7440 Essay Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

History 115 section 7440 Essay Discussion

History 115 section 7440
spring semester 2020
professor oscar cañedo
guidelines for nacla assignment #2

This is the second installment of the two nacla report on the Americas reviews that you will submit for this class. This review is to be at least 3-4 pages and this due date of may 8, at 11:59 pm corresponds to the nations of south america. You can cover a topic from any of these nations and others in the continent: bolivia, argentina, brazil, colombia, chile, etc. . To select an article, go to the general forum and find the thread with articles on south america, then pick any one article from the list. The articles range in dates from early 2019 to april 2020.

please submit your review through the canvas in either of the following formats: doc, docx or pdf. Late papers will be accepted but only for one week after the assigned due date and will be assessed a full grade deduction. Please use both a title page and a works cited page (neither of these pages count toward your 3-4 pages of text). The two nacla reports you submit will count as a combined 25% toward your final grade. In your works cited page, compose your article entry in a format like this:

gabriel hetland and george ciccariello-maher, “the state of the left in latin america: a disillusioned revolution in venezuela,” nacla report on the americas website (july 21, 2017).

History 115 section 7440 Essay Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!