Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
HLS400 Homeland Security Public Cooperation
HLS400 Public Cooperation in Homeland Security Unit 5 Group Discussion Board Running head: PUBLIC COOPERATION IN HOMELAND SECURITY Deliverable Length: 2-3 pages Assignment Details Group Portion 1 The public has a role to play in homeland security. Your group’s job is to recommend a policy position on the subject of martial law as a whole. Should civilians be obliged to submit to military policing of U.S. streets in the case of a terrorist attack or a natural or man-made calamity, is the question asked to you?
Complete the following tasks using the library, the internet, or any other available resources: Write a 300-500 word post about the prospect of martial law in the aftermath of a terrorist attack or a major natural or man-made disaster.
What exactly is the point of martial law? Explain.
What kind of a disaster would have to occur for the government to declare martial law? Why?
Currently, how likely do you believe martial law will be implemented in the event of a major terrorist attack or natural disaster? Explain.
In terms of the United States, What are the grounds against the deployment of martial law in terms of the constitution and civil liberties? Explain.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain your position.
Requirements for writing in the APA style: 2 to 3 pages
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
HLS400 Homeland Security Public Cooperation