How Do You Think Your Own Pregnancy

October 13, 2022

How Do You Think Your Own Pregnancy

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

How Do You Think Your Own Pregnancy

How do you think your own pregnancy (or your wife’s) will be (was) the same or different than your mother’s?

Interview your mother and/or father (if this is not possible, try an aunt, or uncle, or grandparent) about your own prenatal development. Use the following questions to get started.

Was this a planned pregnancy?

Was this your first baby?

How did you find out you were pregnant?

How did you feel?

Were you working?

When did you see a doctor?

Did you take vitamins?

When did you start feeling the baby?

When did you begin wearing maternity clothes?

What changes did your body go through?

What are some of the strongest memories you have of this pregnancy?

Did you have any prenatal tests?

How did your lifestyle change?

Did you smoke? Drink alcohol? Drink coffee or tea? Take any drugs?

Did you know the sex of the baby before the birth? Did you have a preference for a boy or a girl? How did you feel when you found out the sex of your baby?

When did you decide on a name for the baby?

Did you attend any special classes or workshops about childbirth, nursing, etc.?

Did you know of any preexisting conditions?

Where were you living?

Were there any features/characteristics you were hoping the baby would have? Were there any you were hoping the baby would not have?

How much of your spouse’s medical history did you know? In retrospect, how important would that have been?

What role/expectations did you have for this child?

What influenced your decision to have a child at this time?

Did you have any trouble conceiving? Did you expect to have any trouble getting pregnant?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met