How to Define Hypertension
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
How to Define Hypertension
1. Think about a hypertensive patient you recently cared for.
How did the diagnosis come about? Was it, for example, based on many clinic BP readings, ABPM, or HBPM? Was it done with both arms?
2. According to NICE recommendations, the diagnosis of hypertension should be based on clinic measurements as well as ABPM. The ESH/ESC (2013) report, in fact,
It is suggested that the function of ABPM and HBPM be enhanced because they are better predictors of outcomes.
Can you, however, provide another approved adjunct to clinic blood pressure to confirm the diagnosis if your patient was unable to tolerate ABPM, refused it, or ABPM was unavailable?
3. Blood pressure and pulse levels are frequently measured using automated BP equipment.
How would you confirm that the reading was accurate if your clinic did not have access to a manual device?How to Define Hypertension
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow How to Define Hypertension
dzsgdcf