HR7 Paycheck Fairness Act Discussion Essay
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
HR7 Paycheck Fairness Act Discussion Essay
As you read this week, the state is “gendered,” meaning that the various institutions providing a system of power and authority are shaped by cultural constructions of gender – that is, definitions of what it means to be a woman or man. One of these gendered institutions is the law. Gender, in particular inequality between women and men, gives rise to some of the issues addressed by legislation (for example, violence against women or unequal pay). Gender also influences the responses to issues – in the form of the bills you are reading. Gender also can produce different consequences of legislation for women and men, with some of these differences quite easy to see and others less visible.
For this discussion, you’ll be examining legislation recently considered by the U.S. Congress. Go to www.congress.gov (Links to an external site.). Search on a topic of interest or just peruse some of the bills, resolutions, or amendments considered by the current (117th) Congress (either the House or the Senate). You’ll find some by searching on obvious topics like contraception, abortion, equal pay, or sexual assault. But you can also look for a bill that doesn’t reference gender so directly. For example, you might find a bill addressing an issue that you see as clearly shaped by gender, but the implications of it haven’t really been dealt with in the bill. Or you might find a bill that could have different effects on the lives of women versus men (or girls versus boys), but this variation isn’t dealt with in the bill. After you select a bill, resolution, or amendment that addresses, in some way, gender inequality, answer these questions.
(80 points) How does this bill reflect gender in the U.S. in 2021? Here are questions to get you thinking critically. Some may be more relevant to your bill than others.
What issue does the bill address? Thinking about what you’ve learned about gender’s impact on many realms of social life, why does this issue exist?
Why is the issue being addressed – and in this way rather than others? What does this explanation say about gender in our society?
How does the bill reflect assumptions about women and/or men? How explicit are these assumptions in the bill?
Does the bill have different implications for women and men? If so, describe them.
Be sure to think about what the bill does, and does not, mention. Your bill might deal with an issue with gender relevance, but it might not be fully appreciated. What are some of the less visible ways that gender is shaping the bill and/or its likely consequences?
HR7 Paycheck Fairness Act Discussion Essay
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow